 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
04-05-2010, 12:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Grading will always be somewhat subjective. So there will always be those who think on both ends of the spectrum - that PSA grades well or doesn't.
Labeling errors will happen no matter what...it's the law of averages. And since they offer free corrections of mislabeling, there isn't much more that they can do than that. As far as their "stupid" registry goes, it does have its upsides and downsides. I happen to like the keeping track via a checklist aspect. The point of this thread is to get PSA to fix their inaccurate checklist for the PSA master set, so that potential collectors like myself could attempt it. As long as it stays uncompletable and inaccurate, it is worthless. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1971 PSA HOF, 68-79 PSA and some raw | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 09-05-2009 06:59 AM |
| Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2009 10:05 AM |
| T201 MIDGRADE SET SGC PSA GRADED *NOW SOLD* | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 02-09-2008 10:16 AM |
| PSA GRADED 1,2, & 3's 60 T206's NEW SALE PRICES | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 09-27-2006 04:16 PM |
| PSA Graded T-206's for Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 09-21-2006 09:19 PM |
Threaded Mode