![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't believe that the ACC designations are wrong, however, I do believe that the future of the T206 might break down the set even more. I think that burdick got it correct that this is a massive set that has 524 subjects. What I think will happen in the future will be a breakdown of the set into subsets. I think that it will eventually carry the designation of T206-1, T206-2, etc and each one of the subsets will be broken down with their designated backs. This is what I believe will be the "evolution" of the t206 set due to the great research of Ted, Scott and others.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New theory why American Beauty cards are narrower than other T206's | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 04-05-2010 09:16 PM |
T206 American Beauty contest....can you confirm these ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 06-23-2009 04:26 PM |
PSA 5 American Beauty & Cycle T206s Sold. | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-30-2008 09:26 PM |
T206 American Beauty's and Cycle's | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-20-2006 01:59 PM |
T206 Cycle's and American Beauty's For Sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 02-12-2006 08:41 AM |