Cobb back is not T206 and here's why...

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by usernamealreadytaken

SOMEONE BEFORE US SAID THATS THE WAY IT IS SO THATS THE WAY IT IS!

There was a time when slavery and disallowing women the right to vote was the way it is...wonder how history would have played out if society took the approach "our forefathers said that was how it was so who are we to question that and try to get it right?"

That's not what I said, but you have chosen to not understand it.

I have no idea whether or not the Cobb/Cobb was intended to be part of the same set. It doesn't matter. It's a T206 because the guy who made up the term T206 said it was. The intent of ATC isn't relevant. ATC didn't call them T206. Burdick did. It's not your right to change his classification system to suit your thoughts. If you want to make it part of a different set, or its own set, go right ahead. Come up with a new system. Don't use Burdick's.


And the whole bit about slavery???? You're just making yourself look silly on that.