 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
06-10-2010, 02:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
You got it backwards, Jay. "Hobby convention" is to go by the named player, not the photo. Otherwise I could throw out my 1969 Topps Aurelio Rodriguez cards and still pretend to have a complete set.
The J. Strauss/Struck sounds more like a typical OJ misspelling than anything else. Is there a J. Struck who played at that time? If every card had to definitively be proven to picture the right player, especially in vintage sets, we would have anarchy! Anarchy I tell you! We just can't allow that. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Collector, Mastro, PSA & Our Beloved Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 85 | 05-31-2008 01:55 PM |
| How Would You Change The Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 04-06-2008 02:32 PM |
| This is the Most Important Topic in the Hobby! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-29-2006 04:35 AM |
| When It Was A Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-06-2005 10:17 AM |
| Hobby History 101 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-16-2003 02:59 PM |
Threaded Mode