Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by barrysloate  Allow me to pose a hypothetical situation:
 ... But instead of giving it a numerical grade, it prints a label which reads: "Gem quality photo, paper loss to reverse." No number grade is assigned. ...
 | 
	
 I love that idea, and believe it should be done for all cards, not just OJs.  Beckett was a step better than just a single grade when it broke down the grade to four subgrades of corners, edges, surface, and centering, but it did away with that idea a few years ago and only continues subgrades for modern cards.
A description is a lot more helpful IMO than a simple overall number.
"EX/NM corners, strong original photo, hairline surface crease at top left, 50/50 centering" is better than "VG" grade, but of course that will cost the TPGs more time, which = more $$$$