 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
03-11-2011, 05:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Put me in the minority, but I liked their system back then. The surface of this card graded a 1.5 (in between "poor" and "fair"). Its otherwise a decent looking card, so the other grades brought it up the max it was allowed to go (I believe "1" grade higher than its lowest mark) so it gets a 2.5.
Had they graded the card a "5", sure lets rip them apart. If it was rebacked and not caught, a reprint, trimmed, color added, etc then I'd see a good reason to called them "terrible". But c'mon, it was graded a 2.5! Haven't we seen SGC and PSA slabbed cards with paper loss graded a 2? So we're ripping BVG cuz they gave a card a 2.5? Last edited by tiger8mush; 03-11-2011 at 06:00 AM. Reason: i'm still learning how to spell ... hopefully I caught the mistakes before Barry did! :) 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BVG vs. SGC | ichieh | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 05-24-2010 07:03 PM |
| For Sale BVG graded T206's | drdduet | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 04-05-2010 10:18 PM |
| "impressed"- with....bvg....grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 04-29-2009 04:09 PM |
| FOR SALE: 1949 Bowman BVG Graded | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-18-2009 02:00 PM |
| FS - 1954 Bowmans - SGC and BVG - high grades | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-03-2007 01:51 PM |
Threaded Mode