 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who sucks the least? PSA or SGC? | |||
| PSA sucks the least! |
   
|
42 | 17.43% |
| SGC sucks the least! |
  
|
146 | 60.58% |
| They both suck equally! |
  
|
53 | 21.99% |
| Voters: 241. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
06-26-2012, 07:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I've always favored the SGC slab, customer service etc. In the mid '90s, my first SGC card was the '59 Mantle. Red on Black is amazing. Post war card in a SGC holder was rare. Still is, but I was hooked. Sent in 25 more '59s to get them graded. More for the look than the number on the label.
I too believe PSA (usually) brings more in resale - but I'm not collecting for resale. My heirs will be left a note saying "consider sending everything to PSA for more $$". BGS slabs are too big - but are hurricane proof. PSAs are too easy (IMO) to fake or reseal. OT: I can't stand those registries. I've seen too many 9s that look better than 10s - but are 'worth' 90% less because to the label. I even own a 10 with a wax stain on the back. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1948 Leaf Football Master Set for Sale (#1 on PSA Set Registry) | OTWCards | Football Cards Forum | 1 | 06-23-2012 09:01 PM |
| PSA & SGC Diamond Stars for sale | heisman95 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 08-15-2010 05:51 PM |
| For sale Or Trade...Tons of High Grade Vintage Baseball...Many New Items | btcarfagno | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-06-2010 11:31 AM |
| Closed eBay store. Leftover PSA stuff FSH | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2009 11:05 AM |
| Memory Lane Redux? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 162 | 04-18-2007 06:51 PM |
Threaded Mode