Showing off a custom cut signature booklet - Steinbrenner

[Cfern023]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

Rarity and value, huh?
At the time those two snapshots I showed were signed, they were no big deal--they had essentially no monetary value. And they were common--Ruth spent hours signing anything and everything presented to him. Does that mean they should have been cut up?
I'm sure many, many such photos, though, were destroyed--that's why they're (relatively) rare today.
I guarantee you this, though. There are far fewer signed photos of Steinbrenner than of Ruth. That's not to say that they ever will have the value of a Ruth-signed photo--they won't. But they still should not be destroyed.

And just so you know, I don't live in a studio apartment, I'm married to a real, live woman (and we talk all the time), and I don't give a damn about baseball cards. And disagreeing with you certainly does not mean that I need to "grow the hell up."

You do realize that grow the hell up part is his signature, right?

http://net54baseball.com/member.php?u=148

You strike me as the type of guy who will argue Mitt Romney is the best, until someone agrees with you and flip to say that Obama is.