 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
04-11-2013, 05:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Ultra premium high grades do nothing for me personally. Yes they're nice looking and definitely command high dollars, but I would never pay the premium just for pointy corners. I've always preferred my vintage cards to have a little "aging" to them, not trashed by any means, just some evidence of the years gone by. So in regards to your question, I personally would put a greater value on the ultra rare backs over a high grade as long as the card is presentable with nice eye appeal.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why not a higher grade with a qualifier for tape on back? | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-26-2012 04:52 PM |
| Wtb/wtt: T206 cobbs in mid grade or higher | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-14-2012 04:23 PM |
| looking for a 56 Clemente white back in higher grade | Zact | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-10-2011 03:37 PM |
| WTB: T206 Persons, any back, SGC-graded 30 or higher | wolf2039 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-13-2010 01:55 PM |
| Low Grade Rarer T206 Backs | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-21-2005 11:20 AM |
Threaded Mode