|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Kind of like instant replay in MLB. Eliminate the human error in grading?
__________________
Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would think the technology should exist that a card could be scanned by a TPG, and they would have some type of record that the card was already submitted in the past or the wrong card is in the holder. It would be a similar technology in which peoples identity can be recognized by facial recognition software. For example, it I think the technology should exist that if someone submits a raw Art Shell card, the company could immediately tell from a simple scan that the card once resided in a PSA 8 holder and wouldn't be as quick to bump the card up.
Now, the price for this technology would obviously impact the cost of grading and you would have to have some type of cooperation with all TPG companies. I'm not sure how much of an appetite exists for that considering the vast majority of collectors don't play in this universe. I know a few years ago, there was an individual that was trying to sell people the idea of taking detailed pictures to get a forensic history of a card. I do think there might be a market for some type of higher-end grading service, especially with high-dollar cards. IMO, as the fraudsters get better and better, collectors will require more proof that they are buying legitimate cards before plunking down large amounts of money. Last edited by vintagecpa; 08-23-2013 at 03:07 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I definitely agree there would be demand at the top of the market for a higher-end service. It does seem a little funny to see Honus Wagner, Eddie Plank, and Baltimore Sun Ruth rookie cards in PSA or SGC holders. In effect, it would be like taking an original Monet to the local framing store around the corner. I am not disparaging those TPGs...in fact, they could be the ones offering the higher end of service...but it seems odd that a million $ card would be put in the same holder as any other card with a minimal level of assurance and protection.
There really ought to be holder and a method of documenting high-value cards that goes beyond the basic service. We have all seen pretty good knock-offs of PSA holders, for example, that could easily fool most collectors. I think the need is there but it would cost a lot. And barriers to entry into the TPG business seem steep. Such innovations may have to come from within the big three. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Andy the design of my holder is a Lexan plastic in a deep gray/near black color with a clear area for the flip that is etched in and not inserted.As far as cost for the program to be developed as well as a software program and scanner I can say it is going to be a costly sum but the pattent will make it worth it in the long run. I do not intend on charging a retared sum of money for this service either. Try to stay at or lower than TPG's now. The hobby will appreciate it more and in return the dividends may be small but will add up over time. Steady wins the race
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 Last edited by T205 GB; 08-23-2013 at 03:38 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
My vote would be .. yes I think people would be interested.
But the one thing that a good TPG should be doing in my opinion ... maintain a database with front/back scans of all the cards they grade .... so that before someone buys a card ... they can look it up and see if it's the same card. After all, anyone can produce a fake PSA slab and label. They can stick anything in there. And you will never know. But if you have the ability to see if it looks like what the company graded ... then at least there's one more check that this is accurate. I also like the idea of having the owner's name of that card associated with it. As it changes hands, the seller/buyer can update. Some may not want to have their names associated with their cards - so it could be voluntary instead of mandatory. But this would be yet another way to verify the card. If I know XXX owns it, and YYY is selling it on Ebay ... that's a pretty good red flag there. Just my 2 cents. Cheers, Patrick |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I might be interested in a service that inspects a card, deems it authentic and unaltered (or not) but does not assign a grade to it. I, as the collector, will decide what grade I think it is. Also, said company should let me choose what kind of holder I want it in (semi-rigid, top loader, mylar sleeve...whatever) then put a small tamper-proof seal over it to avoid switch-out.
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18 Last edited by conor912; 08-23-2013 at 04:24 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As a collector looking for making a potential buyer "sure" the card I am selling is the one I had graded and encapsulated, I would absolutely pay more to have my card scanned and kept on file somewhere. How many others would do this? I am not too sure. Good points and I have always thought a scanning service along with grading service to verify card grade would be useful Z Wheat. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
It would be hard to accurately grade issues like n172's with this service. I collect this set as well and pretty much do not pay attention to grades anyway, but rather the image quality.
I find it slightly humorous that some high graded N172's have a highly faded image while other low graded card have way more eye appeal. Z Wheat |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
tpa's arent that bright to take a "fingerprint" photo of every card, they dont have the time. it's bag and slab and move on.
you have to believe in yourself, you have to refine the process, into a proof of concept. I agree the high end is the way to go if you have a safecracker proof system. the downside is that the collectors who own these high end cards usually have them in a registry set, that is the hook psa set up to keep them in psa holders, which i dont like. but you have to invent the system and prove it first, then the customers will be there if it works great and it is a better mousetrap. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's not about the high end collector. I am after the everyday collector and some piece of mind when buying and selling. The high end collector is welcome but not what I am focused on catering to.
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the constant complaints you hear about the current TPGs proves something better is needed. Whether what you propose is it, remains to be seen. But if you can create something that can basically uniquely identify each card, provide a more accurate and repeatable grading standard, and do it for the same cost, then I think you may have a winner.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't see how it'd be possible to do that for the same cost?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Disturbing: "High-tech doctoring"/ "restoration" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-27-2007 01:26 AM |
| OT: At least 22 Dead at Virginia Tech | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 248 | 04-24-2007 03:03 PM |
| VBC low-tech snipe service. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-22-2007 06:27 PM |
| Mile High Card Company's Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 11-30-2006 09:41 PM |
| Grade Tech - WOW! More and more, I really like this company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 08-23-2002 03:23 PM |