|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oy, vey. Gentlemen, part one was painful enough to read.
Should the focus be whether or not default scanner settings are the way to go - or - whether or not an accurate scan is appropriate? As it pertains to the OP (in this thread) questioning a disappearing dot on the Mint 9 hockey card, I strongly feel as though some sort of shenanigans were in order there. It seems to be clear fraud to me. I may be mistaken. Best Regards, Eric
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (136/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (198/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Basically, it is just a bunch of people arguing about nothing. Or just writing snarky comments. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
...and on two concurrent threads no less.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's not that they're arguing about nothing, it's that nothing will come from it.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mandating new auction-wide scanner rules is laughable. As is special, scary stationary for hobby watchdog groups run by the fraudsters themselves.
Lawsuits, grand jury subpoenas and indictments are the only things which will stop the fraud -- or at least slow it down.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Pressuring companies to disclose policies is not a new tactic. Companies are often pressured to disclose labor practices, political donations, carbon-footprint information, among other things. Will increased disclosure stop fraud? No, but it could slow it down - just like lawsuits, grand jury subpoenas and indictments. And pressuring for disclosure and prosecution don't have to be mutually exclusive - they can be done in conjunction. Just remember: you can prosecute - and lose. It is no slam dunk, either. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ask anyone who's ever been indicted how much they enjoyed the experience, win or lose.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don’t care if they have their 3 year old color me a picture of the card with Crayons, as long it is a close representation of the card. Lance said it best earlier in this thread, “Hold the seller accountable for the accuracy of the image posted, not the means they employed to produce it." |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
This thread sux....too much bickering and you lose the importance of the subject
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pwcc | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 280 | 02-17-2017 10:14 PM |
| Increcible prices for PWCC auctions | Peter_Spaeth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 103 | 09-22-2016 08:46 AM |
| Did anyone get the T206 SGC 86 O'hara on PWCC? | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-30-2013 08:36 AM |
| Anyone win any of the STAMPED E90-1 cards from PWCC? | CaramelMan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 08-08-2013 04:51 AM |
| Latest PWCC | drmondobueno | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 02-14-2013 03:15 PM |