|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
What about omissions? I'm on the fence about this one, but how hard is it for the seller to say that some of the cards have pinholes, particularly when the scans are so small that it can be reasonably argued, imo, that they were made that way to be intentionally deceptive? IMO, a seller like legendary shouldn't really be relying on caveat emptor to defend a shitty description. It's just bad business.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone else having problem w/SGC set reg? | Vegas-guy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-13-2012 12:02 PM |
| Legendary Auctions - Problem last night | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 11-18-2010 06:24 PM |
| Problem with SCD | IronHorse2130 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-09-2010 06:08 AM |
| Looking for honest opinions on Legendary's T-206 Eddie Plank | JP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 74 | 03-15-2010 07:38 PM |
| SGC Problem | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2008 06:59 AM |