 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
12-05-2013, 12:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I love the 9000f - as Chris said, very fast scans, plus I can scan negatives and slides. The software is somewhat complicated (to me anyway) but I think I have it figured out. Look for new, improved runscott scans soon.
Probably 3-4 times faster than the Epson it replaced, and much more reliable. Well worth the extra $70 or so.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why did I wait so long to get a proper scanner? Loving my CanoScan 9000F! | jb217676 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 07-15-2014 07:42 PM |
| 1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 08:51 PM |
| SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 01:36 AM |
| Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 07:41 PM |
Threaded Mode