|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Couldn't disagree more than post #144, especially.........
"Fourth, I absolutely do NOT agree that the buyer had any obligation to ask for a better deception or larger scan." If you're spending your hard earned money you should take 2 minutes to send an email to address your concerns period! If the cards were raw and the defects not mentioned I would agree. Whether an auction house,ebay or the b/s/t here, the buyer should be a bit more vigilant and ask any questions prior to sealing the deal. Since they were the lowest numerical grade by SGC (the board's majority choice) he got exactly what he paid for. I'm not defending Legendary in any way but I feel this is somewhat of a frivolous post to begin with. So now I'm curious, will David bid with them in the future?
__________________
Rich@rd Lap@int |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone else having problem w/SGC set reg? | Vegas-guy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-13-2012 12:02 PM |
| Legendary Auctions - Problem last night | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 11-18-2010 06:24 PM |
| Problem with SCD | IronHorse2130 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-09-2010 06:08 AM |
| Looking for honest opinions on Legendary's T-206 Eddie Plank | JP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 74 | 03-15-2010 07:38 PM |
| SGC Problem | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2008 06:59 AM |