|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great looking card, Jeff. As I've said before, a lot less of a card's material is lost to small pinholes than to well-worn corners. If you really have to look hard to see why the card has been down-graded severely from what its general appearance is, IMHO, that kind of defect has only a minor effect on its desireability. I'd take that Cobb any day, without "batting" an eye!
Sincerely, Larry Last edited by ls7plus; 11-18-2014 at 06:29 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 01:52 PM |
| I have a new found bitterness toward pinholes.. | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 06-05-2014 10:38 AM |
| Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 10:11 AM |
| Pinholes & Grading Co's | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-08-2010 10:25 PM |
| FS: T3 Hal Chase GAI 2.5 no creases or pinholes | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-02-2008 12:18 PM |