 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
03-18-2015, 04:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I've never seen an altered qualifier on a card graded authentic by SGC, is that something new? In that same vein, on newly slabbed SGC cards (since the new flip let's say) can one now assume that a card grade authentic, with no altered qualifier, is indeed not altered? It's weird that they would specifically mention it on some flips and not on others when assigning the grade authentic.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help Valuing a T206 - Frank Smith Chicago/Boston Card | gregstarling | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-24-2013 09:49 PM |
| WTB T3 with Ad Back in Poor/Fair/Authentic Condition | 25801wv | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 10-25-2012 06:56 PM |
| poor versus authentic | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-23-2012 09:38 PM |
| Help ID'ing and Valuing This Babe Ruth Photo | bcookie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-30-2011 09:47 AM |
| Authentic/Altered vs Authentic/Beaten Cards | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-20-2010 11:17 PM |
Threaded Mode