|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, is there a way to have something printed on the leather versus "stamped"? I also think this Ruth is not a real signature because of the size. Doesn't the signature appear to be small compared to the usual way Ruth signed? Unless this is a large ball.....that signature appears rather small and compact, which is why it seems printed or stamped on there.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ruth Sig - Real or Not so much? | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 01-30-2011 09:54 AM |
| Are 1917 Collins-McCarthy Babe Ruth and 1921 Oxford Ruth real? | Peleseller | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-07-2011 03:07 PM |
| Real Ruth or not? | yanks12025 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 11-04-2009 02:06 PM |
| Real Ruth? | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 10-30-2009 07:48 PM |
| This '33 Ruth #53 isn't real, is it? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-22-2001 01:51 PM |