 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
10-23-2015, 05:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I really think that the Munson is not faded. The letters are clearly magenta (not red). Red is created during the printing process by adding yellow ink to the magenta ink. I think if it were a matter of fading due to light exposure the other inks should have faded as well to some degree. Yet you don't see that. You can also see that the photos in the card with white letters do not contain the yellow ink giving them a 'faded' look.
I'm wondering if it is a color correction proof card or just a rare error that got through quality control. Does anyone know if they made color correction proofs with the backs printed? Very cool card nonetheless. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Junk Wax FS? | vintagetoppsguy | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 3 | 08-22-2015 05:50 AM |
| WTB/WTTF: 1952 Topps raw cards - they can be junkie! | jimivintage | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 02-14-2013 04:52 PM |
| 1952 Topps Junkie... | Digger41 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 05-22-2012 11:54 AM |
| You know you are a card junkie when.....(part 2) | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 04-10-2012 09:57 PM |
| You know you are a card junkie when..... | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 101 | 11-13-2011 09:29 PM |
Threaded Mode