|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
"I'm still trying to convince myself of what would be a very unpopular opinion, which is that with T207, every variation except the 3 Livingstons is simply a print flaw... including Lewis (no-emblem)"
I agree Mike and always have. When the printing flaw creates a lack of a letter or emblem i think it's a bit more significant than a faded color. At least more interesting, but in my opinion none of these should be considered part of the set. When printing these I don't think they intended for the letter to be missing. Here was a printing error I found in a collection a while back: t207 dooin.jpg Shows that they printed dark red over pink. Last edited by caramelcard; 10-31-2015 at 02:13 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T207 Lewis No Emblem - How Many? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-16-2006 03:55 PM |
| T207 Brown Back Variation Confirmed. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-02-2005 01:43 AM |
| new t207 variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-03-2005 10:42 PM |
| T207 Gowdy "No Emblem On Sleeve" variations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-11-2004 02:19 AM |
| E97 Sullivan Variation Confirmed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-14-2002 10:20 PM |