|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
| 
 | |||||||
| View Poll Results: Undergraded ??? | |||
| Yes |      | 6 | 11.32% | 
| No |      | 16 | 30.19% | 
| Graded just right |      | 31 | 58.49% | 
| Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Is it just me or do these seem undergraded ??? 
			
			I used to think SGC was the more consistent of the grading companies but these couple leave me scratching my head. Thoughts ? Just added Danny Murphy MC ??? Trimmed ??? If so not sure why it got a numerical grade or even past a 10/1 
				__________________ 429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% Last edited by Joshchisox08; 10-31-2015 at 03:42 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Devlin looks to have a small amount of paper loss on the back above the word "series".  If it does no matter how small it's an incomplete card and deserves no more than a three in my opinion despite a nice front.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			That's a valid point however it's microscopic portions of the card lol.
		 
				__________________ 429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  undergraded 
			
			Scott looks at least like a 3.5. Delvin's a 4. I just purchased this "4" tonight   
				__________________ MyStore: http://royce-classic-vintage-cards.ebid.net/ Smooth Transactions ezez420.frankbmd.northviewcats.t206hound.Beatles Guy.team-of-rivals.LukeLyon.ValKehl.Double-P-Enterprises.Hcom24.midmo.pow323.Tolstoi.WillowGrov e.Dougscats.t206Collector.cammb.pclpads.Jobu.eseho mbre.BocaBirdman, 38Goudeyman and many more | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			SGC will only give a 3 at best with paper loss. I had a NrMint Babe Ruth that I bought from a fellow board member that had a speck of paper loss on the right border and it got a 3.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			The Scott could be a high 3 or low 4 I agree with Robert on the Devlin because of the paper loss.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			If I sent those in I'd be hoping for a 4 on Devlin and a 3.5 on Scott.  Nice cards no matter what the slip of paper says!
		 | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			The Hoffman has a big '44' written in blue crayon on the back.  That could be the reason for the downgrade.
		 
				__________________ -- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Maybe on the Devlin SGC 40 but otherwise spot on.
		 
				__________________ Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp. | 
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Each card seems to have an issue that justifies the grade.  I think all three are about right.
		 
				__________________ Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. | 
| 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  These cards 
			
			absolutely look correctly graded. They have nice eye appeal for their grades but all have issues some fairly serious which dictates their grades. I could honestly see the Devlin getting a lower grade before i could see any of the others grading higher.  I wouldn't drop over if i sent the Devlin in and got a 30 or 35.
		 Last edited by glynparson; 10-31-2015 at 06:01 PM. | 
| 
			 
			#12  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   Quote: 
 Thanks for the responsed. 
				__________________ 429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Undergraded Cards: Show Yours | GasHouseGang | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 25 | 02-02-2014 12:30 PM | 
| Undergraded??? | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-15-2013 06:51 AM | 
| Undergraded? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 03-25-2010 01:10 AM | 
| Undergraded???....lets see 'em | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 12-01-2009 09:38 AM | 
| Truly undergraded or trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-15-2008 09:31 AM |