![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you very much for the nice write up. Thinking about starting one of those sets, just sure which way to go. Thanks again
__________________
Always ready to do some old fashioned trading!!! Send me a message if you want to get a trade going. Currently working on: 53 Topps, 61 Topps, 52-55 Redman, 47-66 Exhibits, 53 Bowman color, 52 Topps, 51-55 Bowman, 64 Topps Stand Ups My trading page: http://natesbaseballcardtradingco.weebly.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nate,
Can't really miss with any of those sets IMO. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I love '71 myself, but in addition to being condition sensitive, there are quite a few cards that are extremely difficult to find centered, Starting with Claude Raymond, followed by Jim Lonborg, Jim Brewer, Mike Wegener, Joe Torre, Bob Gibson, Mike Fiore, Rico Carty, Gary Sutherland, Lee Maye, Thurman Munson...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Love the 73 set, and am working on one presently. The set has an iconic rookie in Schmidt, and the last cards of Mays and Clemente. The set also has a lot of HOF'rs. Undervalued set IMO.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! Last edited by KCRfan1; 11-14-2015 at 10:47 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Z |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1970 is not too hard to complete. The higher numbers can sometimes be hard to find because there are so many of them when you account for the semi-highs. There really is not killer rookies which drive the price up, although the Nolan Ryan card can be a little costly.
1971 is not too hard to collect if you don't want higher grade. Once again, no killer rookies. If you want higher grade, its a bitch to complete. 1972 is hardest to complete of all the high number sets from the 1970s in my opinion. It is easy as anything to complete a low number set of these. 1973 has the Schmidt Rookie and it's also a high number. The high numbers, in my opinion seem to be somewhat plentiful. If I were to have a choice of building any of these sets, I'd build them in this order... 1971 (because its so tough to build in high grade) 1972 (the high numbers are in higher demand than all of the others) 1973 (actually my favorite and first year I collected) and 1970
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I love the 73 set. If you're looking for a set with character, the 73 set has everything from ridiculously funny airbrushed hats and uniforms, odd photo locations like Tug McGraw in someones back yard with a crutch leaning against the shed, and bizarre actions shots like Luis Alvarado throwing on a playground lot next to a line of parked cars.
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not to mention that Tug McGraw is wearing a glove with "Hammer" written on it. My guess is it may belong to John Milner whose nickname was the Hammer. Milner played left field in 1972, thus the glove not being a first base mitt which was Milner's normal position.
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA Slab differences | ksabet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-25-2013 09:36 PM |
Whats the differences?? | pawpawdiv9 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-20-2013 11:39 AM |
PSA Label Differences | MrPosadas | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 06-13-2011 09:02 AM |
E93 Wagner price differences | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-11-2005 01:41 PM |
E104 -1 -2 -3 differences | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-27-2004 11:46 AM |