Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469
Wasn't getting at anything. Just making a point. If it was indeed a case of a new submitter getting a one grade bump, I would be more than pissed if I was the original submitter. Like a previous poster stated, what if it was a Mantle rookie and the difference in grade was a huge chunk of change? Should the original submitter have not gotten the benefit of the correct grade? He paid for a service after all.....
|
Yeah, that's the unfortunate thing with grading. Catching someone on a good/bad day can either mean you make out well or get a raw deal.
My guess is that it all balances out or comes close to it. Think about the original submitters that get a better-than-expected grade. Everyone has these sorts of stories, but I used to have a PSA 3 Moe Berg 1933 Goudey that I showed here on the board a year or so ago. That thing looked much closer to a 1.5 or a 2. Whoever initially got that grade (wasn't me) made out handsomely. Not even close, obviously, to Mantle Rookie handsomely, but you get my point.
I guess the moral of the story is that it's generally better to hang on to cards that look undergraded.
__________________
T205 (208/208)
T206 (520/520)
T207 (200/200)
E90-1 (120/121)
E91A/B/C (99/99)
1895 Mayo (18/48)
N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100)
N162 Goodwin Champions (32/50)
N184 Kimball Champions (38/50)
Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225
www.prewarcollector.com
|
12-14-2015, 12:30 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode