![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
fixed it for you, irv.
i did not get scammed. how you know is by googling the name you are about to give thousands of dollars to prior to giving it to them. (he said he found this thread by googling the guy's name AFTER it was too late) you use amex via paypal so you are protected and there is a paper trail. cards of a certain caliber you send in to get reviewed or reholdered to verify your cards are real. (does it suck, sure. but in comparison what is another $85 on top of a couple grand you are forking out?) use the registry, even if not competing, so you know if a duplicate cert has been created.* don't meet people off of craigslist. use reputable dealers. * that's your cue, jake! ; ) Last edited by begsu1013; 05-17-2016 at 08:25 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Good points.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no worries, irv!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FWIW, the Jordan looks real to me, just trimmed. I would have to see the back to be sure. The Jackson is definitely trimmed. They probably buy raw (or maybe even graded) Ex/Mt to NM cards and trim them down to look NM/MT or better and put them in a fake slab with a fake flip. And, it may not even be a fake slab and fake flip. They could be the real deal. Someone at PSA could be "backdooring" them. PSA is a dirty, dirty company.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Come on, Peter. How easy would it be for an employee to sneak out some slabs and flips?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have no idea. I imagine they have video security and possibly other measures.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.
Last edited by begsu1013; 08-23-2016 at 12:07 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
To say PSA is in on this is totally absurd. Yeah let's risk a hundreds of millions and our reputation on a couple trimmed cards and fake slabs.
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39 *Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #7 all-time. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This is the SAME COMPANY that graded the T206 Gretzky/McNall Wagner KNOWING THAT IT WAS TRIMMED. That card was the foundation of their business. In other words, their whole business was built on a lie. ![]() Edited to add: I think most here would not do business with a dealer that knowingly sells trimmed cards. Then why would you do business with a company that knowingly grades trimmed cards? And knock it off with the 'but SGC...blah, blah, blah" comparison because they're no better in my opinion. Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 05-18-2016 at 05:56 AM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How is PSA complicit in this at all, I don't see it. As previously stated the scam is simple:
1) Obtain a real psa 9 from the market place; 2) Crack open the holder and replace the true psa 9 card with a trimmed/altered card of the same subject that appears to be of high quality after the alteration (the flip is a true flip and will match the registry); 3) Sell the bogus card in the cracked holder with real flip and re-coup original money shelled out to buy the original valid card in 1) above; 4) Take the true psa 9 that you still have and resubmit to psa most likely garnering another psa 9 grade and repeat from step 2) above (all funds received from here on out are profits to the scammer); 5) Repeat over and over again. Seems pretty simple and clear. Am I missing something? How is PSA complicit, heck even if PSA somehow noticed that someone was resubmitting the same card over and over it could be assumed that they were trying to obtain a higher grade. I can think of only one solution, PSA has to start putting some type of marking on the card visible only under ultraviolet light. Any card they receive for grading with that marking has to ALSO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ORIGINAL CASE AND FLIP IN ORDER TO BE REGRADED. What do you think of that solution? |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The slabs show no evidence of tampering (no frosting). The flips show no sign of being cracked out (it's hard to crack out a card and not scratch and/or wrinkle the flip). The same serial number on the flips are being used over and over on multiple cards (the flips are being mass produced). |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
but again and as ya mentioned previously....who's to say they are not cracking out going for the higher? edit: i believe the term is called laser marking / stamping Last edited by begsu1013; 05-18-2016 at 08:11 AM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just read from first to last post. This thread is quite the education. I found this site not long ago while looking to gain info on a particular seller. These threads are important. I know no one needs me to point that out, but just my way as a relative novice of thanking and encouraging you vigilant veterans of the hobby. I appreciate it. And even more, I now understand the value of the name policy. Cheers.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ebay seller - not so honest about "RARE" 1955 Pittsburgh roster | hcv123 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 02-04-2015 08:29 PM |
Fake "National Game" Cards on ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-29-2007 11:28 AM |
Did you buy a W517 from eBay seller "run4urdreams" in June? If so, please read | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-22-2007 01:54 PM |
Ebay scam "lesson 103" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-16-2006 03:03 PM |
A new "seller" scam email | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-05-2003 05:33 PM |