 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
06-20-2016, 09:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
PSA has improved their holders. Yes, they're pretty silent on their mistakes, but they also don't publicize when people put fake cards into cloned or compromised holders. They have also improved the flips to validate questionable cards. They're not perfect, but when I go to them to fix something they've done wrong, I've been pretty satisfied.
Beckett used to put subgrades on vintage cards in BVG holders, but stopped doing that. PSA's not perfect, and I never contended they were. They're still the best out there, and their Registry is second to none. Having the registry has also scuttled many fraudsters/thieves from moving cards as easily.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thoughts About A Grading Proposal | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-02-2016 10:50 AM |
| Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-16-2014 09:58 PM |
| Thoughts on GAI grading? | paulcarek | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 11-14-2014 04:36 PM |
| My thoughts on these stupid grading posts | Kenny Cole | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 91 | 05-22-2010 12:47 AM |
| Thoughts on grading | ptowncoug3012 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-30-2010 10:52 PM |
Threaded Mode