|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are quite a few artists whose work I like enough that I'd take a damaged painting - Or for many of them a print if they made them- than a nice example of a painting by an artist I don't like. Of course, that's from an enjoyment perspective. So, a really bad anything by da Vinci over a nice Picasso. Or maybe even a genuine Escher print over a nice Picasso. Now of course, if I'm not actually paying the "real" price for it I'll go with whatever is likely to sell for more And I've never been all that picky about condition with cards, If I buy a boxful, and some are nicer than the ones I already have I'll upgrade, but I rarely go out of my way to upgrade. Steve B |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lowest Valued Rarities? | ksabet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 04-28-2014 09:58 PM |
| Under valued (or underappreciated autographs) | daves_resale_shop | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 15 | 07-30-2012 12:54 PM |
| Are all PSA 5s equally valued? | wmullis | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 09-26-2011 05:12 PM |
| D303 - under appreciated and valued | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-08-2003 04:33 PM |
| Most under-valued vintage set? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 04-01-2002 12:13 PM |