 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
07-07-2016, 07:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I agree somewhat. I was watching PSA videos on YouTube the other day regarding their authentication and grading process. The way the process is done one would wonder how they can miss or mess up. I think 98% of their work is legit. It's the scammers out there that crack the cases open and insert the fake or reprinted cards. How they do it is beyond me. Seems like a lot of idiots out there have too much time on their hands. With technology as advanced as it is these days it's not a surprise.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How accurate are the pop reports for SGC and PSA? | Luke | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 11-11-2014 05:26 PM |
| Is the SMR accurate? | Matthew H | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-01-2010 08:55 PM |
| How accurate is the PSA Registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-24-2008 07:06 PM |
| PSA vs. SGC - consistent and accurate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 02-09-2006 08:14 AM |
| Accurate Vintage Stats: where to go? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-12-2003 05:20 PM |
Threaded Mode