 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
08-15-2016, 08:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Third-party grading - and the collectors who rely on it - are too fixated on numbers and "grades". Theoretically, a computer would be able to tell you all of the flaws in your card - like compare it digitally to a mint example, with pictures of creases, corner damage, centering, trimmed, etc. But, why assign a single number grade to that?
We get into trouble as a hobby when we focus on the number and not the card. It's not a competition - or is it?
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: HOF RCs & Future HOF RCs | toadkc | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 07-18-2016 01:59 PM |
| Future of card grading? | Vintagevault13 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-29-2014 06:04 PM |
| The future has rejected TPA card grading | travrosty | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-28-2013 04:30 PM |
| Future for Psa? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-23-2008 05:53 PM |
| future of grading companies | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-22-2005 08:27 AM |
Threaded Mode