 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31
08-15-2016, 08:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
So it had to receive a numerical grade cause PSA was just starting up? So come right out of the gates being shady and lying? I know of several cards that have been submitted 3-5 times and all received a different grade each time. One being the 1914 CJ Matty. First time authentic trimmed,then a 2,then a 4??? I have seen the scans. It's just gotten to the point of "if you can't beat em, join em mentality cause they have control of so much of the market.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: HOF RCs & Future HOF RCs | toadkc | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 1 | 07-18-2016 12:59 PM |
| Future of card grading? | Vintagevault13 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-29-2014 05:04 PM |
| The future has rejected TPA card grading | travrosty | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-28-2013 03:30 PM |
| Future for Psa? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-23-2008 04:53 PM |
| future of grading companies | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-22-2005 07:27 AM |
Threaded Mode