NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2017, 01:48 PM
KMayUSA6060's Avatar
KMayUSA6060 KMayUSA6060 is offline
Kyle May
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 1,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
I don't really know what else to say other than a Supreme Court ruling is a Supreme Court ruling. Title IX is a Supreme Court ruling as well. It unequivocally applies to sports. How do I know? Because it is the law that says you must provide for both sexes, even in terms of sports teams. Now, you said that a sports program was "extracurricular" and not under the ruling. But if that is true, how do you explain Title IX and the law that says a public school must comply?
Don't get me started on Title IX. That's a joke of a law in and of itself.

The Supreme Court says a lot of things. Doesn't mean I have to agree with them; I just have to abide by the laws.
__________________
Need a spreadsheet to help track your set, player run, or collection? Check out Sheets4Collectors on Etsy.
https://www.etsy.com/shop/Sheets4Collectors

- Grover Hartley PC

- Jim Thome PC

- Cleveland Sports Hall of Fame
  #2  
Old 10-02-2017, 01:49 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,196
Default

That is the exact issue I brought up. Louisiana Parish doesn't know the law, and isn't acting within it when it threatens to punish public school students protected under Tinker vs. Des Moines by the highest court in our country.

Last edited by packs; 10-02-2017 at 01:50 PM.
  #3  
Old 10-02-2017, 02:24 PM
KMayUSA6060's Avatar
KMayUSA6060 KMayUSA6060 is offline
Kyle May
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 1,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
That is the exact issue I brought up. Louisiana Parish doesn't know the law, and isn't acting within it when it threatens to punish public school students protected under Tinker vs. Des Moines by the highest court in our country.
Title IX visibly applies to sports. Tinker v. Des Moines does not.
__________________
Need a spreadsheet to help track your set, player run, or collection? Check out Sheets4Collectors on Etsy.
https://www.etsy.com/shop/Sheets4Collectors

- Grover Hartley PC

- Jim Thome PC

- Cleveland Sports Hall of Fame
  #4  
Old 10-02-2017, 02:39 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMayUSA6060 View Post
Title IX visibly applies to sports. Tinker v. Des Moines does not.
Tinker v. Des Moines applies to any and all silent, non-violent protests that take place on public school grounds. It is about protecting civil liberties, not protesting specifically and it protects public school students on school grounds. It's history is steeped in students who chose to wear black armbands to school during the Vietnam War.

Last edited by packs; 10-02-2017 at 02:41 PM.
  #5  
Old 10-02-2017, 02:43 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
Tinker v. Des Moines applies to any and all silent, non-violent protests that take place on public school grounds. It is about protecting civil liberties, not protesting specifically and it protects public school students on school grounds. It's history is steeped in students who chose to wear black armbands to school during the Vietnam War.
For the sake of argument, let's just say you're right. So, once again, where's the law that says they coach has to play them?
  #6  
Old 10-02-2017, 02:45 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,196
Default

I don't know what that has to do with anything. I brought up a public school who sent notice that it would unlawfully punish its players for lawfully protesting.
  #7  
Old 10-02-2017, 02:53 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
I don't know what that has to do with anything. I brought up a public school who sent notice that it would unlawfully punish its players for lawfully protesting.
You don't know what it has to do with anything?

It relates to what you said because even though the school or coach may not legally be able to punish them, they can get around that by just not playing them. They still get punished, it's just unofficial. Get it now? Need a 5 year old to explain it to you?
  #8  
Old 10-02-2017, 05:18 PM
cammb's Avatar
cammb cammb is offline
Tony. Biviano
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 2,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
That is the exact issue I brought up. Louisiana Parish doesn't know the law, and isn't acting within it when it threatens to punish public school students protected under Tinker vs. Des Moines by the highest court in our country.

The Supreme Court does not make law. Only congress and states can. Congress can negate any Supreme Court decision

Last edited by cammb; 10-02-2017 at 05:25 PM.
  #9  
Old 10-02-2017, 05:31 PM
packs packs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cammb View Post
The Supreme Court does not make law. Only congress and states can. Congress can negate any Supreme Court decision
Congress cannot overrule a Supreme Court decision. The decision is the interpretation of the law. Congress can change the law that the court decided upon, or amend a portion of the Constitution, but it cannot ignore the ruling of the court.

Last edited by packs; 10-02-2017 at 05:31 PM.
  #10  
Old 10-02-2017, 06:06 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
Congress cannot overrule a Supreme Court decision. The decision is the interpretation of the law. Congress can change the law that the court decided upon, or amend a portion of the Constitution, but it cannot ignore the ruling of the court.
Congress can only propose an amendment, not amend. That's up to the states.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.

My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-02-2017 at 06:07 PM.
  #11  
Old 10-02-2017, 07:31 PM
cammb's Avatar
cammb cammb is offline
Tony. Biviano
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 2,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
Congress cannot overrule a Supreme Court decision. The decision is the interpretation of the law. Congress can change the law that the court decided upon, or amend a portion of the Constitution, but it cannot ignore the ruling of the court.

Again, reread what I posted. No mention of congress overruling Supreme Court
Closed Thread



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 PM.


ebay GSB