Show...me...your print variations!

[bobsbbcards]

[ALR-bishop]

I would sympathize with the graders that this one is tough to spot , and likely should not be a variation either in SCD or the Registry, but if PSA is going to include they should have someone on staff that knows what it is or isn't.


To me the blob version is more distinctive and easier to identify. In fact ,even the blue dot by the cap thing posted by Cliff above is more interesting to me Is that recurring too ?

I like collecting variants but this one is a dud even for me.

[ALR-bishop]

Here are the 4 Topps 1960 cards I mentioned in post 985. In each case the gray back is on top and white back on bottom

--On Grunwald 427, there is dot to right of his cap in insert on white back



--On Rodgers, 431, the white mark just above the logo in lower left is bigger in gray back version



--On Jones, 410, there is minor white area above the logo on gray back and a red area in the ball within the logo on white back



--On Williams, 414, there is a line/mark at end of his truncated arm in insert on gray back. Looks blueish to me in hand



I have not looked at the backs of all the cards in the series to see if there are differences beyond the stock differences. And would not be surprised if I missed other front differences

[steve B]

Rogers, Jones and Williams are registration issues, not actual cropping differences.

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Here are the 4 Topps 1960 cards I mentioned in post 985. In each case the gray back is on top and white back on bottom

--On Grunwald 427, there is dot to right of his cap in insert on white back



--On Rodgers, 431, the white mark just above the logo in lower left is bigger in gray back version



--On Jones, 410, there is minor white area above the logo on gray back and a red area in the ball within the logo on white back



--On Williams, 414, there is a line/mark at end of his truncated arm in insert on gray back. Looks blueish to me in hand



I have not looked at the backs of all the cards in the series to see if there are differences beyond the stock differences. And would not be surprised if I missed other front differences

[ALR-bishop]

Don’t disagree at all. Most of the cards posted in this thread are just recurring print defects of one kind or another.

[4reals]

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop

Don’t disagree at all. Most of the cards posted in this thread are just recurring print defects of one kind or another.

That is true, however, every so often we are exposed to a nugget. I’ve been out of commission for a while but came out of hiding to share this 1960 Morrell crop variation of good ‘ol Charlie Neal (see scoreboard in background).
In the same set I have also seen crop variations of the Furillo (backstop poles), the Alston (yellow steps/number of fans in seats), the Moon (player jersey number/number of arches), and Koufax (size of flag pole tower).




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[brett 75]

Not sure if I put this one up or not after looking through over half the post to find it I gave up. Here is an interesting one of the red birds.

[Prof_Plum]

Originally Posted by bobsbbcards

That makes no sense. I mean why even have "no white streak" on the flip. Are they going to designate all regular versions as "no white streak" ??????

Just curious are there other "no XXXXXX" labels with regards to versions?

[ALR-bishop]

,,,,to tick Bob off. It worked