 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-26-2018, 05:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
corners
I collect mostly PSA 5 cards. Over the last 4 years I put together a T206 HOF set. My most obvious point which reflects in previous posts is the corners. SGC consistently graded T206's with touched (slightly rounded ) corners a 60/5. PSA is stricter with that as ones with rounded corners end up 4's possibly 4.5's . I bought many SGC 60's with slightly rounded corners that didn't cross. My guess and its just a guess is that most PSA 5's would cross to SGC 60's and only maybe half of the SGC 60's become PSA 5's. I am glad to hear that SGC is being tougher on corners as it makes sense. However they seem to be holding the course on lightly collected S-74 silks . The hand out 40's to near perfect silks with the factory crease and 60's to horribly frayed silks where the factory or tobacco company is only partially legible. On Leon's point BVG has become better. They do a nice job with the S-74 silks apparently understanding the issue better than SGC
On another note the recent trend of centered nicer looking cards holding as much weight as their grades may be inspiring people to sell there off centered , or lesser looking higher grade cards as a result 
|
|
#2
12-26-2018, 06:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
So there has not been any change at SGC regarding centering?
They used to grade the card, independent of centering, not anymore. A psa 7 oc/mc would be an sgc 6 at worst. Now they told me my psa 7 mc would get an sgc 2!
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors
|
|
#3
12-26-2018, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does SGC do a quicker turn than PSA? My last submission to PSA took several months to receive.
|
|
#4
12-26-2018, 07:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
12-26-2018, 07:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I definitely think SGC upped their standards with the introduction of their new labels. I mean it makes sense. They wanted to rebrand and up the perceived value.
|
|
#6
12-26-2018, 07:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA grading standards for t206s from an average joe | ashes13 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-17-2016 07:07 PM |
| T3 grading standards, PSA & SGC | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-11-2014 02:52 PM |
| Grading Standards - Ours Vs. Theirs | robw1959 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 08-18-2014 11:16 PM |
| Grading Standards - New vs. Old | kcohen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-22-2013 11:02 AM |
| Steve Verkman grading standards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-01-2002 02:36 PM |
Hybrid Mode
