 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27
12-27-2018, 04:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
PSA's grading standards have varied from week to week...maybe day to day. Yet people continue to submit and resubmit and accept it. SGC has been the one constant on the grading front however it would appear, in trying to rebrand themselves, they have tightened up their standards. Hopefully that works out for them but from the cards I have been seeing with the new labels, they seemed to have over corrected.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA grading standards for t206s from an average joe | ashes13 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-17-2016 07:07 PM |
| T3 grading standards, PSA & SGC | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-11-2014 02:52 PM |
| Grading Standards - Ours Vs. Theirs | robw1959 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 08-18-2014 11:16 PM |
| Grading Standards - New vs. Old | kcohen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-22-2013 11:02 AM |
| Steve Verkman grading standards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-01-2002 02:36 PM |
Threaded Mode