 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
01-14-2019, 05:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I don't care how bad the stain is, how does such a ridiculously miscut card, where you can actually see parts of 2 or possibly 3 other cards, not get the MC or OC qualifier first and foremost???
[ATTACH]sdgghjk[/ATTACH]
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land  https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.  Last edited by JollyElm; 01-14-2019 at 04:44 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Who decides value? Is Beckett the only? | Fred McGriff | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 6 | 10-24-2012 07:03 AM |
Threaded Mode