|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll be giving that a good read!
If you were local, I'd like to get together for a long talk, I've read a few cognitive articles, and run into some really interesting firsthand examples of how the identical thing is perceived or not by different people. I think the high resolution scans are the key, At decent magnification the actual fiber structure of the cardboard can be seen, and that's as good as a fingerprint, maybe even a bit better. That would be a more advanced version of what the blowout guy does in finding unique markers on the reverse, which are mostly darker fibers. I think a computer could spot stuff like that very easily, and that might be one path to knowing if a card had been seen before and what it looked like then. The downside is the massive database required. Although I have talked about it with my wife who is in software and she didn't see that as a problem, but did see developing the database as a really major task. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Alteration vs. Conservation Defined in Medicine | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-01-2019 08:50 AM |
| Alteration vs. Conservation Defined | Brent Huigens | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 551 | 05-29-2019 09:35 AM |
| Card Alteration | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-10-2006 07:49 PM |
| Question about card alteration | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-24-2006 06:12 AM |
| Counterfeit Detection Resources | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-12-2003 02:56 PM |