|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
What bugs me is how many people think that none of this is a problem.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Starting with Joseph J. Orlando, apparently.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wasn't aware that Towle can take creases out of cards until I read this article. If it wasn't already apparent, third party grading has virtually no meaning anymore, since nearly every VG card will eventually become a NR MT one. What's the point of even grading cards? Few if any of them are what they appear to be.
Last edited by barrysloate; 09-08-2019 at 10:31 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm pretty sure most people weren't aware that Dick's company offered to take creases out of cards and fix corners. He always talks about the chemicals they have developed to remove gum, wax, and tape stains. He likes to say they only take out things that shouldn't be there anyway. I guess that includes creases.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
True, but if you didn't happen to read the right post on this board, or the article above, you may think all they are about is removing stains.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
He did. And I should make it clear that I don't personally dislike or even know Dick or his company other than a few choice emails after he was told he could no longer be here. There is no doubt he is NOT doing anything illegal. There is also no doubt his work is NOT being sold transparently all of the time. That is an issue. And what he does just goes against the grain of the fraud we are fighting in the hobby.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-10-2019 at 02:31 PM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
It is not my intention to challenge any of your views regarding TPGs, grading, or card doctoring. I wanted to suggest a possible path forward, one that could make grading even more important. I submit that the TPGs are reasonably competent at grading the cards as presented, despite the unavoidable angst over a half a grade one way or the other. What they have not done historically is identify and screen out doctored cards. So all (or almost all) existing graded cards might have been doctored prior to grading. This uncertainty will weigh on the value of graded cards. The market will sort out those values over time. Another thing the TPGs have not done is keep track of "a digital fingerprint" of each card graded and pool that data so that once a card is graded, it is permanently precluded from being doctored (any further) and then regraded without disclosure. (I am making up digital fingerprint, but it seems to me the TPGs have a clear incentive to implement some form of tracking system so that they can not be exposed ala Breakout in the future.) If I am right, once this system is in place, getting raw cards graded will become the simplest way to put the cards beyond the doctor's reach.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are things that could be done to alter the cards digital fingerprint too. (depending on how that digital fingerprint is done) |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Perhaps the situations are parallel, but I'm not sure the TPGs really signed up to prevent doctoring, but rather committed to standards and practices that were perceived to be adequate to do so. It seems to me now they have no choice but to explicitly prevent the doctoring of previously-graded cards. You are also right that I am assuming the technology is available to support a very effective system for preventing cracking, doctoring, and then regrading without public disclosure. Identifying raw cards that have been doctored may still be difficult.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Hi George, this is from the main PSA webpage where they advertise that they detect trimming. THE GRADING PROCESS PSA authenticates both sports and non-sports trading cards across all eras. A series of PSA graders review your cards for authenticity. If genuine, PSA looks for evidence of doctoring, such as re-coloring or trimming. If your cards pass these two steps, PSA grades the condition of each card on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being best. After grading, PSA holders each card in its own tamper-evident case. A label within the case displays the card's pertinent information and unique certification number.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think graders are useful at authenticating cards, and that is an important service to collectors and dealers-- all the other stuff (especially obviously alteration detecting) is pointless.
If graders provide high-resolution scans of what they grade, that would be an important step. Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No Stain No Gain | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 09-25-2017 07:53 PM |
| What is that stain on the card? | Pythonfactory | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-30-2014 11:13 AM |
| Can this stain be removed? | HOF Auto Rookies | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-28-2013 02:18 PM |
| Stain or Transfer | Bwstew | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-11-2012 05:21 PM |
| Name that stain! (c'mon - it's FREE!) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-25-2004 01:38 AM |