![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Which would you prefer? | |||
PSA 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 40.54% |
PSA 7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 59.46% |
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok, thank you. Got it, 7 is narrow. Ok.
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
But BTW, just checked... they are the SAME EXACT width. Have PSA cases not varied AT ALL by fractions of millimeters over the years?? Again, I find it ridiculous to make thee statements based on a photograph.
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You elicited opinions concerning two cards. A few posters opined they thought the 7 appeared trimmed. You obviously disagree.
Opinions are not fact. Everyone is entitled their own opinion. So what. No need to get defensive and bent out of shape. Don't ask for opinions if you can't handle the results. I stand by my opinion that the 7 doesn't look right. I'm not perfect and may be wrong, but it is my opinion. Back away from the ledge. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You should measure again. It's not fractions of a millimeter, it's a pretty big difference.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the fat Oprah better.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1964 Topps Pete Rose SGC 70 | Nugen | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 09-05-2018 08:22 PM |
1964 Topps Pete Rose PSA 7 | Peter_Spaeth | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 04-30-2018 04:53 PM |
WTB 1964 Topps Pete Rose | Peter_Spaeth | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-16-2013 06:59 AM |
1964 Topps Pete Rose - $15 | sylbry | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-07-2013 02:21 PM |
FS 1964 Topps Pete Rose PSA 7 | Peter_Spaeth | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-28-2012 07:49 AM |