 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
05-18-2020, 10:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I personally prefer SGC much more than PSA for anything pre-1933.
PSA uses that mylar layer at their discretion which i think displays “not so well.” And for T206s they seem to use it a lot. I even offered to pay them to remove the mylar from my cards and they said no. So that was cool. SGC has great customer service but i think they should stop changing their presentations/flips so often. I like the SGC flips with the smaller numbers much more. Neither company is perfect, but i find dealing with SGC to be actually consistently enjoyable, and dealing with PSA to be consistently aggravating. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hobby question bowman and topps question 1950 to 1953 | Bigdah | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 12-20-2016 07:55 PM |
| 1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 08:51 PM |
| S74(1) question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-14-2006 11:18 AM |
| SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 01:36 AM |
| Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 07:41 PM |
Threaded Mode