|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Unless it's a card that you'd have major trouble replacing, I would just return it. PSA has proven time and again that they cannot detect trimmed cards, and this one will always have a tinge of doubt surrounding it.
Every time you look at the card, I am betting you'll second-guess it more so than enjoy it. So if it's something you could replace (without waiting a year or two), go ahead and hold out for a better example. Even though it may be within PSA's "range of tolerance", the uncertainty will probably eat away at you. Just my opinion, FWIW. Last edited by perezfan; 07-06-2020 at 03:52 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 size variation | CardMD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-28-2017 09:53 PM |
| Size Variation of 1953 Bowman Color | Wichita | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 12-20-2011 12:25 PM |
| M101-2's - size variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-18-2006 10:48 AM |
| How come with every size variation, the smaller card always has sharper corners? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-21-2002 06:01 PM |
| Card Size Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-19-2001 09:40 PM |