|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The basis of my e-mails was to really drive home the point that the blatant mistake really made them look bad (especially with all of the negative attention they're getting with the trimming scandals), plus I employed the term "literally" over and over again to point out that the label was literally wrong. That it wasn't simply an opinion that the card didn't deserve a 'PD' qualifier, but that it was literally stained. Don't know if those tactics will work in your situation, but they were certainly helpful (I believe) with mine. Just stress how bad it makes them look, and that more and more people on the chat boards are really getting frustrated by the fact PSA doesn't seem to care about the ridiculous mistakes they seem to regularly make.
Good luck!!
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGC mistake :-( | Solemany2k | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 05-30-2018 08:23 PM |
| mistake | hcv123 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2018 10:49 PM |
| Bad mistake by PSA? | Baseball Fan | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 17 | 02-28-2016 12:12 AM |
| This is a mistake by BVG, right? | pbspelly | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-18-2014 12:15 PM |
| A mistake, again! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-26-2005 08:42 AM |