|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
According to the blowout post, MC and MK would still remain. I'm not a big fan of this change, and don't think it really saves that much time.
My best guess is that this is a Nat Turner-ism where he and his buddies decided to get rid of it, since the market largely ignores cards with qualifiers; at one point, they were trading around 3 grades lower than the same grade. If they were consistent with their grading standards and gave all Mint conditioned cards with 90/10 centering on front a PSA 3 with no qualifiers, then I'll be interested in seeing how those cards are treated on the secondary market. Because the assumption on the buyer's part is that they're damaged (surface wrinkles), and the centering is incidental. However, if they got a 9(OC) they would be worth a 7 on the registry and a 6 or so in sales price.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Putting PSA to the test? | mferronibc | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 12-22-2019 10:34 PM |
| Anyone putting a PSA order in | kamikidEFFL | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-09-2014 09:49 PM |
| Set You Had Most Fun Putting Together | darkhorse9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 35 | 03-06-2012 01:47 PM |
| Putting together an almost raw monster... | kllrbee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-29-2011 12:12 PM |
| im putting in my resume to PSA | milkit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 08-04-2010 06:25 PM |