Where is the buzz around REA?

Leon · #1 07-25-2021, 03:04 PM

FWIW, I disagree with you. Peter brings up good conversation points.

Quote:

Originally Posted by troutbum97

You're on here 24/7/365, bitching about the card industry.

Everything is a fake, a fraud or a scam. And you continually post over & over & over. *OCD* You have 5 posts already on this fresh thread.

This REA auction is fantastic. I'm loving it. I'm hoping to pick up a few cards that I have been searching for over a year, and they've turned up here.
A few other mixed lots I hope to snag, too. I'm excited. Thrilled. Hopeful.

But, you keep being you, bitching & posting 24/7/365. You saturate these threads with constant negativity.
Your constant negativity has even carried over into the Robert Edwards arena.

Maybe you should log off and take a walk in the fresh air. The world is not so dark & grim away from your keyboard.

Brian May

oldjudge · #2 07-25-2021, 03:13 PM

Don�t get me wrong, I think it is a solid auction even without the Wagner, especially for 19th century. I was just wondering why more people aren�t talking about it.

chadeast · #3 07-25-2021, 03:24 PM

It's another amazing auction from REA, and I was excited to look through it the day it opened, but it's starting to feel redundant to post a thread or even comment about yet another incredible offering from REA, or the other big auction houses. They just keep coming month after month after month, seemingly without end. It doesn't mean that I'm not very interested in this auction though.

EDIT: The sensory overload comment resonates with me too. There are dozens of lots that I'm interested in, though I know I'll be lucky to win any.

Exhibitman · #4 07-25-2021, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge

Don�t get me wrong, I think it is a solid auction even without the Wagner, especially for 19th century. I was just wondering why more people aren�t talking about it.

The first rule of Card Club is that we don't talk about active auctions.
The second rule of Card Club is that WE DON'T TALK ABOUT ACTIVE AUCTIONS.

Yoda · #5 07-26-2021, 12:24 PM

Perhaps we have all gotten a bit spoiled by the multitude of blockbuster REA auctions over the years. The current auction looks great, initial bidding response strong and there should be something for all vintage junkies. Also, I suspect excitement about this week's National have some folks guarding their wallets in anticipation. Post Nat'l the 2nd week should see some serious action, as people are able to see the actual auction cards in REA's cases and may be disappointed in their luck in Chicago.

Tabe · #6 07-26-2021, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda

Perhaps we have all gotten a bit spoiled by the multitude of blockbuster REA auctions over the years.

It's not just REA, it's all the big ones. I mean, even the fact that REA is headlined by a nice T206 Wagner isn't even a big deal. There have been several of those sold in recent months/years - it's just not unusual or exceptional anymore to see items like that offered.

birdman42 · #7 07-26-2021, 08:35 PM

I was talking to a client this morning. His company has been buying businesses like crazy this year (vacation rentals). He says many sellers are concerned about possible changes in capital gains taxes.

Bill

Yoda · #8 07-26-2021, 10:03 PM

Small violin, please.

BobC · #9 07-27-2021, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by birdman42

I was talking to a client this morning. His company has been buying businesses like crazy this year (vacation rentals). He says many sellers are concerned about possible changes in capital gains taxes.

Bill

?????

Johnny630 · #10 07-27-2021, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by birdman42

I was talking to a client this morning. His company has been buying businesses like crazy this year (vacation rentals). He says many sellers are concerned about possible changes in capital gains taxes.

Bill

Up up and away.

marzoumanian · #11 07-27-2021, 06:42 PM

I noticed that in this auction there's a PSA 8 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson (lot 5) that started at a minimum bid of $25,000 and an SGC 8 Topps 1952 Jackie Robinson (lot 6) that started at a minimum bid of $10,000.
My question: Why did REA start the bidding at such a WIDE disparity? The centering on the PSA card MIGHT be a tad better. Might.
Why do I ask? I have a SGC 7.5 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson and I'm wondering if I should break it out (when I am ready to sell) and roll the dice by submitting to PSA.
I am planning to go to the National and will ask REA this question BUT I thought the forum might have some insights. What am I missing? Thanks. Peace.

Johnny630 · #12 07-27-2021, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marzoumanian

I noticed that in this auction there's a PSA 8 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson (lot 5) that started at a minimum bid of $25,000 and an SGC 8 Topps 1952 Jackie Robinson (lot 6) that started at a minimum bid of $10,000.
My question: Why did REA start the bidding at such a WIDE disparity? The centering on the PSA card MIGHT be a tad better. Might.
Why do I ask? I have a SGC 7.5 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson and I'm wondering if I should break it out (when I am ready to sell) and roll the dice by submitting to PSA.
I am planning to go to the National and will ask REA this question BUT I thought the forum might have some insights. What am I missing? Thanks. Peace.

Prob the consigned asked for that price as starting bid.

I would absolutely not break it out and send to PSA. SGC 7.5 is Great :-)

perezfan · #13 07-27-2021, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marzoumanian

I noticed that in this auction there's a PSA 8 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson (lot 5) that started at a minimum bid of $25,000 and an SGC 8 Topps 1952 Jackie Robinson (lot 6) that started at a minimum bid of $10,000.
My question: Why did REA start the bidding at such a WIDE disparity? The centering on the PSA card MIGHT be a tad better. Might.
Why do I ask? I have a SGC 7.5 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson and I'm wondering if I should break it out (when I am ready to sell) and roll the dice by submitting to PSA.
I am planning to go to the National and will ask REA this question BUT I thought the forum might have some insights. What am I missing? Thanks. Peace.

Often the consignor has input regarding where they want the bidding to start. Perhaps that happened in this case. I know PSA slabs sell for more, but have found that 7-8 times out of ten, the SGC card will be superior to the PSA card with the same grade.

Peter_Spaeth · #14 07-27-2021, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marzoumanian

I noticed that in this auction there's a PSA 8 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson (lot 5) that started at a minimum bid of $25,000 and an SGC 8 Topps 1952 Jackie Robinson (lot 6) that started at a minimum bid of $10,000.
My question: Why did REA start the bidding at such a WIDE disparity? The centering on the PSA card MIGHT be a tad better. Might.
Why do I ask? I have a SGC 7.5 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson and I'm wondering if I should break it out (when I am ready to sell) and roll the dice by submitting to PSA.
I am planning to go to the National and will ask REA this question BUT I thought the forum might have some insights. What am I missing? Thanks. Peace.

PSA is CRUSHING cards these days. I am not believing the gorgeous 6s I am seeing that people are showing me. Probably a colossal failure of AI and failure of graders to override the AI grade. The problem is now that they are fingerprinting cards good luck ever getting them to change it.

Casey2296 · #15 07-27-2021, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marzoumanian

I noticed that in this auction there's a PSA 8 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson (lot 5) that started at a minimum bid of $25,000 and an SGC 8 Topps 1952 Jackie Robinson (lot 6) that started at a minimum bid of $10,000.
My question: Why did REA start the bidding at such a WIDE disparity? The centering on the PSA card MIGHT be a tad better. Might.
Why do I ask? I have a SGC 7.5 1952 Topps Jackie Robinson and I'm wondering if I should break it out (when I am ready to sell) and roll the dice by submitting to PSA.
I am planning to go to the National and will ask REA this question BUT I thought the forum might have some insights. What am I missing? Thanks. Peace.

I sold my 52Jack at auction in the Spring head to head, my SGC4 against a PSA 4. Mine was the nicer card by a small margin. It sold for 3K less than the PSA. If you have a 6.5 it will sell well either way, especially if it has eye appeal. Take it to the National and ask PSA what grade they would put on it.

jcmtiger · #16 07-26-2021, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge

Don�t get me wrong, I think it is a solid auction even without the Wagner, especially for 19th century. I was just wondering why more people aren�t talking about it.

No Detroit though.

BobbyStrawberry · #17 07-26-2021, 01:16 PM

My excitement at seeing the offerings was immediately tempered by the sky-high bidding only hours into it.

Exhibitman · #18 07-26-2021, 02:17 PM

There's one thing in there I might chase a bit...

nineunder71 · #19 07-25-2021, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon

FWIW, I disagree with you. Peter brings up good conversation points.

+1

And I�ve never seen Peter renege on the BST, like I have Brian. Following through on your own commitments is sooo much more important than whether you agree with someone else�s opinions. Just my two cents

JimC · #20 07-25-2021, 04:08 PM

Definitely a lot of great stuff in this auction. I certainly think auction fatigue plays a role in the enthusiasm level, but it'll pick up.

Like Leon, I appreciate Peter's observations. It's a great hobby but there's no question there are a lot of bad actors and the problem hasn't been addressed meaningfully, let alone solved. Just my opinion. I think there's plenty of room to enjoy the hobby but still object to the bad stuff. We don't have industry leaders taking up that mantle so we need the experienced collectors to do it.

Johnny630 · #21 07-25-2021, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon

FWIW, I disagree with you. Peter brings up good conversation points.

Agree Highly Valued Member +1

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Buzz Nutter	LuckyLarry	Football Cards Forum	4	06-12-2020 02:29 PM
Buzz Aldrin	Touch'EmAll	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	3	09-12-2017 12:43 PM
Get well Buzz Aldrin	Snapolit1	WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics	11	12-05-2016 08:41 PM
WTB Zeenut Buzz Arlett	simas7173	1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T	1	10-19-2011 10:13 PM
Buzz Arlett????	quinnsryche	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	20	11-07-2010 06:04 PM