![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PSA is now recognizing the bandage variation - there’s a “6” listed as an auction on eBay. I have a cross-over to send in now, and yet again PSA has figured out how to get more of my $.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
While looking through 1967 Topps 6th Series cards I figured there had to be some cropping difference on the #531 Checklist (Brooks Robinson) because it was printed on the 6th Series sheet and the 7th Series sheet. I found at least one, on the 6th Series sheet card there is a small gap between Robinson's chin and the black line, on the 7th Series sheet card Robinson's chin barely touches the black line with no gap.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At least I don’t have to go out and get one of these 😊
How many checklists, if any, from 1960 to 1973 have only one version |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The 71 Coin checklist appears on the 2nd and 4th series sheet. Any other checklist cards that appear in multiple non-consecutive series? To answer your question Al, I have always felt that the 61, 63, 64, 66, 68-72 1st series checklists, as well as all 73s have one version. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I have differences for 61, 64, 66, 68, 69, and 70. What I thought I remembered for 73 was actually the 2nd CL
61— names and boxes at different heights ? 64— box 44 can have a line and box 14 a dot 66– Merritt can have a botched M and spacing difference of card # to bottom 68– CR location difference ? 69– McClains collar and USA on back with or without periods 70– 226 Peranoski-with or without . after P Pursued this kind of stuff in my younger days. Can’t see well enough anymore so have to rely on you guys and threads like this one Last edited by ALR-bishop; 06-17-2022 at 02:04 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For the '67 checklists (and other things), check out this old thread:
https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=207639
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The 1963 Topps 1st series checklist also has variations. The front can have a black line top border or not. The size of the box on the reverse with the card number "79" can be a square or rectangle. The copyright wording is is also lower/higher. Mike img06182022_059 (2).jpg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Mike. Agree on 63. I have one version with a black line under the red box on front, one with yellow line and one with no line. Registration differences probably, but also box size shape differences on back.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |