 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-13-2022, 01:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
As for the 5 rounds. That wasn't my idea, that was part of recently proposed legislation, so I thought I'd see what people think about it. Clearly people that are pro gun rights are not open to this idea. 
|
|
#2
06-13-2022, 01:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Normal good guys with guns are going target shooting or hunting they are not out trying to stop some moron from killing others.
|
|
#3
06-13-2022, 01:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
A bad guy with a gun won’t follow mag restrictions.
Even pretending they will and that a magazine over 5 no longer even exists: A bad guy with a gun is coming loaded to do damage, they don’t have to conceal their stuff at the scene. They will bring lots of magazines. Having to reload more when they are up against a room of unarmed people does not really slow them. The good guy with the gun (unless the gun control crowd would like to suggest it’s fine for me to carry my M4 openly, which is legal in some states but uncommonly done even there as a course of normal life for the obvious reason that citizens don’t expect to need to use heavy gear) is generally concealing a light handgun, and aren’t carrying 10 pounds of gear. It’s a pistol, and maybe an extra mag or two. The good guy having 17 rounds instead of 5 that won’t even fit in the magazine well because it’s too short sounds a lot better. Forcing pre-Civil War capacities is extreme, even if it wasn’t blatantly illegal by the most clear violation of the common use standard there could be.
|
|
#4
06-13-2022, 02:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is again, a subject that I think much like religion, finding a middle ground is impossible as minds are concreted. However, I do like to actually hear people's thoughts and the reasoning. As to the "good guy with a gun" statement, as 95%+ historically of these incidents other than the supermarket were "soft targets" (IE: areas where guns are illegal to carry and or possess for non-criminal elements) I would think without change to the carry laws that only police whom are the current solution would be the available responders. I personally do not see a possibility of a civilian response to a school, church, or government building currently a viable thought. Even if successful in stopping an attack, a zealous prosecutor could provide a minimum 5 year stint to the "good guy" with little effort. I think this issue is the structure toward the difficulty of solution on these incidents (for any side).
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. Last edited by JustinD; 06-13-2022 at 03:14 PM.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB Comiskey (ownership years card) for evolving HOF set. | Misunderestimated | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 01-02-2020 08:50 PM |
| One more way to ruin the hobby - fractional ownership | Throttlesteer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 49 | 08-14-2019 02:19 PM |
| Help determining ownership status of several high profile items | Sean1125 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-29-2015 10:42 AM |
| Ownership of old photographs | theantiquetiger | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 08-17-2011 02:43 PM |
| Scan Ownership | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-14-2005 01:10 PM |
Hybrid Mode
