|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
1952 Bowman is a better set than 1952 Topps for these reasons:
1. Better artwork 2. Prices aren't inflated which makes it more collectible 3. Smaller set which makes it more collectible 4. Mays is a scarce high number but still more affordable than it's Topps counterpart, despite it's better image and lower population. 5. The Stan Musial card is one of the best looking baseball cards EVER (and Topps is lacking Musial) 6. The image on the 1952 Mantle makes me think of the Mona Lisa...while the double printed Topps Mantle is sort of ugly. OK, I'll admit the omission of Jackie Robinson in Bowman is a pretty big downside...but overall Bowman is still better. (OK, feel free to kick me off the boards for these opinions)
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wantlists - to share or not to share (and why?) | Angyale | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 09-13-2021 05:44 AM |
| Share a great hobby story | Aquarian Sports Cards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 06-07-2020 10:58 PM |
| 2019 Net 54 Card Set Post #4 - Card front layouts! Share your opinions! | Golfcollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-07-2019 11:19 AM |
| Hobby history: Card dealers of the 1960s: James T. Elder (+ hobby drama, 1968-69) | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-08-2017 06:23 PM |
| OT, but a great share! State of the hobby | 7nohitter | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 03-12-2014 07:57 PM |