|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
These are usually in bad shape, or at least the ones I can afford are bad. This one is bad but looks way worse because of the PSA baggie.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
1914 Cracker Jacks. The war paper + grading makes zero sense.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cards with the thinnest stock: T200, T222, Cracker Jacks
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DELETE ppl are too sensitive. | Joshchisox08 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 72 | 07-02-2015 04:09 PM |
| WTB 1980's rare,oddball,low print run, tiffany, updates, condition sensitive cards | smrtn240 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 10 | 01-20-2013 01:57 PM |
| What is the most condition sensitive set of cards? | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 02-23-2010 08:59 AM |
| Condition sensitive pre-war card sets? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 01-24-2008 09:59 AM |
| OT, and "possibly" a sensitive issue (finally my reply) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 09-03-2006 08:20 PM |