 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28
06-21-2023, 12:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Unfortunately, the date of E78 is made up - just something hobbyists have claimed to be true without an evidentiary basis. There's no way to know if it's 1908 or 1910 or 1912. Same for E26. I think E8 is in the same boat; there is no evidence for 1910 as opposed to another year in this period.
I would expect it is more likely it was just a test sheet, or they ran the wrong sheet(s) through the printer for the second side than that E78 was on the same exact shape and the sheet was correct but run upside down. This can't be eliminated though, it could look like E96. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fs: e90-1,e92,e93,e95,e96,e98,e101,e102 | eliminator | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 12 | 11-11-2013 07:06 PM |
| E92 vs E101 vs E102 | Matt | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 05-17-2009 07:52 AM |
| For Sale: E92, E93, E101, E102 -- few Sold -- E101 added | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 6 | 01-22-2008 06:20 AM |
| e101 vs. e102 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-27-2007 06:18 PM |
| E101 vs. E102 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-04-2002 09:56 PM |
Threaded Mode