![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because every time you send in for a re holder they give you a completely new flip and serial number.
More so because I think the owner realized that PSA owns the registry market. People who are PSA registry guys will not switch over to SGC. They just won’t most of the guys who collect SGC are hard-core collectors, less so bragging rights guys who like to be number one on the registry, at least that’s what I’ve noticed over the years Sure there are differences amongst different people, but that just seems like the general thought. I think it’s a good idea that SGC never wasted their money on a registry. It never would’ve taken off to the full extent. Last edited by Johnny630; 03-26-2024 at 11:09 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Sale Jackson(part 2) Ruth part 4 | mrreality68 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 08-24-2023 02:44 PM |
Part sports talk, part collectibles: Mcfarlane figures | the 'stache | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 21 | 05-18-2019 12:12 AM |
Best of the Registry | baztacula | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 07-11-2015 06:49 PM |
Part Bruce Lee, Part Ty Cobb, overall just bad! | pencil1974 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-14-2015 06:00 PM |
SGC set registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-24-2002 02:01 PM |