![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Unless I am looking at this the wrong way, what incentive is there for Nat to put money into a combined registry? It makes SGC cards more valuable in the market but isn't he in essence just competing against himself?
I prefer SGC to PSA but I must be lacking the long distance vision to see how Collectors benefits by having two separate grading brands. My assumption has been that at some point SGC either gets sold off or folds into PSA.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I feel Collectors bought SGC to prevent someone else from doing so and as long as they are profitable will keep the brand going but at some point I think it goes away. If they did away with the SGC brand would those collectors not use PSA and go to CGC or Beckett? Maybe SGC loyalists would refuse to cross over?
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correct. Its not going to happen.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I doubt it and some vanilla quote from Nat in one interview doesn't sway me nor does anything else said here so far.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They're supposedly creating A combined registry, not combining THE registry. Set Registry gurus will surely still favor the PSA-only flavor so they can continue to pretend their sets are superior.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would love it were it to happen but I am not seeing this as something that is going to come to fruition. Nat's comment in the interview clearly indicate they are short of tech resources to even address PSA's set registry needs, whatever those might be. When you factor into that a poll showed only 22% of the people collect both PSA and SGC cards, this has to be a very low priority.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Combined into another post. | iwantitiwinit | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-21-2023 04:47 PM |
combined threads | camaro69 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 5 | 07-24-2020 06:28 PM |
combined threads | camaro69 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 2 | 07-05-2020 06:41 AM |
OT: Phillies combined No-No | Michael Peich | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-02-2014 04:01 PM |
CJ 14s: No Combined SGC/PSA Pop Report? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-07-2014 10:42 PM |