|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 04-14-2025 at 02:30 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jeter - 2,747 games
Trout - 1,533 games If I could have eithers career on a team, as that career has actually happened and actually existed in the observable real world and not a hypothetical that does not exist in reality, I would probably take Jeter right now. I can fill SS with a star for 2 decades, or have Trout missing half the games but providing much more value in the games he does play. If we mean the player at their absolute best, it is Trout and not even close. If it means comparing Jeter to a guess of what Trout's full career will end up being, who knows. As Trout has played more games than Betts and has been better than Betts, I would take Trout, assuming considering their actual careers as they have happened in reality to date. Going forward, I'd probably take Betts if both were free agents and I could sign one. Gazing into a crystal ball and attempting to divine the future to arrive at total career values, I would guess Betts will end up higher than Trout, due to the injuries. At their very best, it is unlikely Betts manages to surpass Trout's peak as Betts is 32 and going strong, but very unlikely to improve. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mookie Betts -- is he underrated? | bk400 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 12 | 02-25-2025 05:38 PM |
| How about Mookie Betts! | bk400 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 7 | 04-09-2024 06:52 AM |
| How about Mookie Betts! | bk400 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 0 | 04-02-2024 07:12 AM |
| LTTF 2014 Mookie Betts RC | hociman | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-29-2020 09:11 AM |
| WTB Mookie Betts RC's | BoSox1908 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 05-13-2018 01:33 PM |