 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
01-19-2002, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
How come with every size variation, the smaller card always has sharper corners?
Posted By: Plastic Dog
that there are graded cards out there that I'm comfortable with; but most of those take up the entire PSA holder (can't tell with SGC, since while some of their holders are precut, many are cut to fit a specific card.) It's the cards that have quite a bit of extra room in the holders (usually top to bottom) that I question. It's hard to justify paying $400-500 for a PSA-8 T-206 when it is a little short in the holder. Maybe it is good. But if you go through and look at all of the "8s" on EBay, it's ironic how many of them have quite a bit of extra room either above or below the card. On the flip side, here's a card I would be comfortable purchasing: 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| e91-c, card size? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-21-2006 07:22 PM |
| M101-2's - size variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-18-2006 10:48 AM |
| now you see it now it's smaller- scan size | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-16-2006 09:10 AM |
| smaller card toploaders? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-15-2005 03:36 AM |
| Card Size Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-19-2001 09:40 PM |
Threaded Mode